bayesian_testing is a small package for a quick evaluation of A/B (or A/B/C/...) tests using
Bayesian approach.
Implemented tests:
- BinaryDataTest
- Input data - binary data (
[0, 1, 0, ...]) - Designed for conversion-like data A/B testing.
- Input data - binary data (
- NormalDataTest
- Input data - normal data with unknown variance
- Designed for normal data A/B testing.
- DeltaLognormalDataTest
- Input data - lognormal data with zeros
- Designed for revenue-like data A/B testing.
- DeltaNormalDataTest
- Input data - normal data with zeros
- Designed for profit-like data A/B testing.
- DiscreteDataTest
- Input data - categorical data with numerical categories
- Designed for discrete data A/B testing (e.g. dice rolls, star ratings, 1-10 ratings, etc.).
- PoissonDataTest
- Input data - non-negative integers (
[1, 0, 3, ...]) - Designed for poisson data A/B testing.
- Input data - non-negative integers (
- ExponentialDataTest
- Input data - exponential data (non-negative real numbers)
- Designed for exponential data A/B testing (e.g. session/waiting time, time between events, etc.).
Implemented evaluation metrics:
Probability of Being Best- Probability that a given variant is best among all variants.
- By default,
the bestis equivalent tothe greatest(from a data/metric point of view), however it is possible to change this by usingmin_is_best=Truein the evaluation method (this can be useful if we try to find the variant while minimizing the tested measure).
Expected Loss- "Risk" of choosing particular variant over other variants in the test.
- Measured in the same units as a tested measure (e.g. positive rate or average value).
Both evaluation metrics are calculated using simulations from posterior distributions (considering given data).
bayesian_testing can be installed using pip:
pip install bayesian_testingAlternatively, you can clone the repository and use poetry manually:
cd bayesian_testing
pip install poetry
poetry install
poetry shellThe primary features are classes:
BinaryDataTestNormalDataTestDeltaLognormalDataTestDeltaNormalDataTestDiscreteDataTestPoissonDataTestExponentialDataTest
All test classes support two methods to insert the data:
add_variant_data- Adding raw data for a variant as a list of observations (or numpy 1-D array).add_variant_data_agg- Adding aggregated variant data (this can be practical for a large data, as the aggregation can be done already on a database level).
Both methods for adding data allow specification of prior distributions (see details in respective docstrings). Default prior setup should be sufficient for most of the cases (e.g. cases with unknown priors or large amounts of data).
To get the results of the test, simply call the method evaluate.
Probabilities of being best and expected loss are approximated using simulations, hence the
evaluate method can return slightly different values for different runs. To stabilize it, you can
set the sim_count parameter of the evaluate to a higher value (default value is 20K), or even
use the seed parameter to fix it completely.
Class for a Bayesian A/B test for the binary-like data (e.g. conversions, successes, etc.).
Example:
import numpy as np
from bayesian_testing.experiments import BinaryDataTest
# generating some random data
rng = np.random.default_rng(52)
# random 1x1500 array of 0/1 data with 5.2% probability for 1:
data_a = rng.binomial(n=1, p=0.052, size=1500)
# random 1x1200 array of 0/1 data with 6.7% probability for 1:
data_b = rng.binomial(n=1, p=0.067, size=1200)
# initialize a test:
test = BinaryDataTest()
# add variant using raw data (arrays of zeros and ones):
test.add_variant_data("A", data_a)
test.add_variant_data("B", data_b)
# priors can be specified like this (default for this test is a=b=1/2):
# test.add_variant_data("B", data_b, a_prior=1, b_prior=20)
# add variant using aggregated data (same as raw data with 950 zeros and 50 ones):
test.add_variant_data_agg("C", totals=1000, positives=50)
# evaluate test:
results = test.evaluate()
results # print(pd.DataFrame(results).to_markdown(tablefmt="grid", index=False))+---------+--------+-----------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
| variant | totals | positives | positive_rate | posterior_mean | prob_being_best | expected_loss |
+=========+========+===========+===============+================+=================+===============+
| A | 1500 | 80 | 0.05333 | 0.05363 | 0.067 | 0.0138102 |
+---------+--------+-----------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
| B | 1200 | 80 | 0.06667 | 0.06703 | 0.88975 | 0.0004622 |
+---------+--------+-----------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
| C | 1000 | 50 | 0.05 | 0.05045 | 0.04325 | 0.0169686 |
+---------+--------+-----------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
Class for a Bayesian A/B test for the normal data.
Example:
import numpy as np
from bayesian_testing.experiments import NormalDataTest
# generating some random data
rng = np.random.default_rng(21)
data_a = rng.normal(7.2, 2, 1000)
data_b = rng.normal(7.1, 2, 800)
data_c = rng.normal(7.0, 4, 500)
# initialize a test:
test = NormalDataTest()
# add variant using raw data:
test.add_variant_data("A", data_a)
test.add_variant_data("B", data_b)
# test.add_variant_data("C", data_c)
# add variant using aggregated data:
test.add_variant_data_agg("C", len(data_c), sum(data_c), sum(np.square(data_c)))
# evaluate test:
results = test.evaluate(sim_count=20000, seed=52, min_is_best=False)
results # print(pd.DataFrame(results).to_markdown(tablefmt="grid", index=False))+---------+--------+------------+------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
| variant | totals | sum_values | avg_values | posterior_mean | prob_being_best | expected_loss |
+=========+========+============+============+================+=================+===============+
| A | 1000 | 7294.68 | 7.29468 | 7.29462 | 0.1707 | 0.196874 |
+---------+--------+------------+------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
| B | 800 | 5685.86 | 7.10733 | 7.10725 | 0.00125 | 0.385112 |
+---------+--------+------------+------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
| C | 500 | 3736.92 | 7.47383 | 7.4737 | 0.82805 | 0.0169998 |
+---------+--------+------------+------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
Class for a Bayesian A/B test for the delta-lognormal data (log-normal with zeros). Delta-lognormal data is typical case of revenue per session data where many sessions have 0 revenue but non-zero values are positive values with possible log-normal distribution. To handle this data, the calculation is combining binary Bayes model for zero vs non-zero "conversions" and log-normal model for non-zero values.
Example:
import numpy as np
from bayesian_testing.experiments import DeltaLognormalDataTest
test = DeltaLognormalDataTest()
data_a = [7.1, 0.3, 5.9, 0, 1.3, 0.3, 0, 1.2, 0, 3.6, 0, 1.5, 2.2, 0, 4.9, 0, 0, 1.1, 0, 0, 7.1, 0, 6.9, 0]
data_b = [4.0, 0, 3.3, 19.3, 18.5, 0, 0, 0, 12.9, 0, 0, 0, 10.2, 0, 0, 23.1, 0, 3.7, 0, 0, 11.3, 10.0, 0, 18.3, 12.1]
# adding variant using raw data:
test.add_variant_data("A", data_a)
# test.add_variant_data("B", data_b)
# alternatively, variant can be also added using aggregated data
# (looks more complicated, but it can be quite handy for a large data):
test.add_variant_data_agg(
name="B",
totals=len(data_b),
positives=sum(x > 0 for x in data_b),
sum_values=sum(data_b),
sum_logs=sum([np.log(x) for x in data_b if x > 0]),
sum_logs_2=sum([np.square(np.log(x)) for x in data_b if x > 0])
)
# evaluate test:
results = test.evaluate(seed=21)
results # print(pd.DataFrame(results).to_markdown(tablefmt="grid", index=False))+---------+--------+-----------+------------+------------+---------------------+-----------------+---------------+
| variant | totals | positives | sum_values | avg_values | avg_positive_values | prob_being_best | expected_loss |
+=========+========+===========+============+============+=====================+=================+===============+
| A | 24 | 13 | 43.4 | 1.80833 | 3.33846 | 0.04815 | 4.09411 |
+---------+--------+-----------+------------+------------+---------------------+-----------------+---------------+
| B | 25 | 12 | 146.7 | 5.868 | 12.225 | 0.95185 | 0.158863 |
+---------+--------+-----------+------------+------------+---------------------+-----------------+---------------+
Note: Alternatively, DeltaNormalDataTest can be used for a case when conversions are not
necessarily positive values.
Class for a Bayesian A/B test for the discrete data with finite number of numerical categories (states), representing some value. This test can be used for instance for dice rolls data (when looking for the "best" of multiple dice) or rating data (e.g. 1-5 stars or 1-10 scale).
Example:
from bayesian_testing.experiments import DiscreteDataTest
# dice rolls data for 3 dice - A, B, C
data_a = [2, 5, 1, 4, 6, 2, 2, 6, 3, 2, 6, 3, 4, 6, 3, 1, 6, 3, 5, 6]
data_b = [1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 4, 2]
data_c = [1, 3, 6, 5, 4]
# initialize a test with all possible states (i.e. numerical categories):
test = DiscreteDataTest(states=[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6])
# add variant using raw data:
test.add_variant_data("A", data_a)
test.add_variant_data("B", data_b)
test.add_variant_data("C", data_c)
# add variant using aggregated data:
# test.add_variant_data_agg("C", [1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1]) # equivalent to rolls in data_c
# evaluate test:
results = test.evaluate(sim_count=20000, seed=52, min_is_best=False)
results # print(pd.DataFrame(results).to_markdown(tablefmt="grid", index=False))+---------+--------------------------------------------------+---------------+-----------------+---------------+
| variant | concentration | average_value | prob_being_best | expected_loss |
+=========+==================================================+===============+=================+===============+
| A | {1: 2.0, 2: 4.0, 3: 4.0, 4: 2.0, 5: 2.0, 6: 6.0} | 3.8 | 0.54685 | 0.199953 |
+---------+--------------------------------------------------+---------------+-----------------+---------------+
| B | {1: 1.0, 2: 6.0, 3: 2.0, 4: 1.0, 5: 0.0, 6: 0.0} | 2.3 | 0.008 | 1.18268 |
+---------+--------------------------------------------------+---------------+-----------------+---------------+
| C | {1: 1.0, 2: 0.0, 3: 1.0, 4: 1.0, 5: 1.0, 6: 1.0} | 3.8 | 0.44515 | 0.287025 |
+---------+--------------------------------------------------+---------------+-----------------+---------------+
Class for a Bayesian A/B test for the poisson data.
Example:
from bayesian_testing.experiments import PoissonDataTest
# goals received - so less is better (duh...)
psg_goals_against = [0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 3, 1, 0]
city_goals_against = [0, 0, 3, 2, 0, 1, 0, 3, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 2]
bayern_goals_against = [1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 2, 1, 0]
# initialize a test:
test = PoissonDataTest()
# add variant using raw data:
test.add_variant_data('psg', psg_goals_against)
# example with specific priors
# ("b_prior" as an effective sample size, and "a_prior/b_prior" as a prior mean):
test.add_variant_data('city', city_goals_against, a_prior=3, b_prior=1)
# test.add_variant_data('bayern', bayern_goals_against)
# add variant using aggregated data:
test.add_variant_data_agg("bayern", len(bayern_goals_against), sum(bayern_goals_against))
# evaluate test (since fewer goals is better, we explicitly set the min_is_best to True)
results = test.evaluate(sim_count=20000, seed=52, min_is_best=True)
results # print(pd.DataFrame(results).to_markdown(tablefmt="grid", index=False))+---------+--------+------------+------------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
| variant | totals | sum_values | observed_average | posterior_mean | prob_being_best | expected_loss |
+=========+========+============+==================+================+=================+===============+
| psg | 15 | 9 | 0.6 | 0.60265 | 0.78175 | 0.0369998 |
+---------+--------+------------+------------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
| city | 14 | 14 | 1 | 1.13333 | 0.0344 | 0.562055 |
+---------+--------+------------+------------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
| bayern | 15 | 13 | 0.86667 | 0.86755 | 0.18385 | 0.300335 |
+---------+--------+------------+------------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
note: Since we set min_is_best=True (because received goals are "bad"), probability and loss are
in a favor of variants with lower posterior means.
Class for a Bayesian A/B test for the exponential data.
Example:
import numpy as np
from bayesian_testing.experiments import ExponentialDataTest
# waiting times for 3 different variants, each with many observations,
# generated using exponential distributions with defined scales (expected values)
waiting_times_a = np.random.exponential(scale=10, size=200)
waiting_times_b = np.random.exponential(scale=11, size=210)
waiting_times_c = np.random.exponential(scale=11, size=220)
# initialize a test:
test = ExponentialDataTest()
# adding variants using the observation data:
test.add_variant_data('A', waiting_times_a)
test.add_variant_data('B', waiting_times_b)
test.add_variant_data('C', waiting_times_c)
# alternatively, add variants using aggregated data:
# test.add_variant_data_agg('A', len(waiting_times_a), sum(waiting_times_a))
# evaluate test (since a lower waiting time is better, we explicitly set the min_is_best to True)
results = test.evaluate(sim_count=20000, min_is_best=True)
results # print(pd.DataFrame(results).to_markdown(tablefmt="grid", index=False))+---------+--------+------------+------------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
| variant | totals | sum_values | observed_average | posterior_mean | prob_being_best | expected_loss |
+=========+========+============+==================+================+=================+===============+
| A | 200 | 1884.18 | 9.42092 | 9.41671 | 0.89785 | 0.0395505 |
+---------+--------+------------+------------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
| B | 210 | 2350.03 | 11.1906 | 11.1858 | 0.03405 | 1.80781 |
+---------+--------+------------+------------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
| C | 220 | 2380.65 | 10.8211 | 10.8167 | 0.0681 | 1.4408 |
+---------+--------+------------+------------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+
To set up a development environment, use Poetry and pre-commit:
pip install poetry
poetry install
poetry run pre-commit installAdditional metrics:
Potential Value Remaining
bayesian_testingpackage itself depends only on numpy package.- Work on this package (including default priors selection) was inspired mainly by a Coursera course Bayesian Statistics: From Concept to Data Analysis.