WRENCH: Weak supeRvision bENCHmark

Last update: Dec 28, 2022

Overview

🔧 What is it?

Wrench is a benchmark platform containing diverse weak supervision tasks. It also provides a common and easy framework for development and evaluation of your own weak supervision models within the benchmark.

For more information, checkout our publications:

WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervision (arXiv 2021)

If you find this repository helpful, feel free to cite our publication:

@misc{zhang2021wrench,
      title={WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervision}, 
      author={Jieyu Zhang and Yue Yu and Yinghao Li and Yujing Wang and Yaming Yang and Mao Yang and Alexander Ratner},
      year={2021},
      eprint={2109.11377},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.LG}
}

🔧 What is weak supervision?

Weak Supervision is a paradigm for automated training data creation without manual annotations.

For a brief overview, please check out this blog.

To track recent advances in weak supervision, please follow this repo.

🔧 Installation

[1] Install anaconda: Instructions here: https://www.anaconda.com/download/

[2] Clone the repository:

git clone https://github.com/JieyuZ2/wrench.git
cd wrench

[3] Create virtual environment:

conda env create -f environment.yml
source activate wrench

If this not working or you want to use only a subset of modules of Wrench, check out this wiki page

🔧 Available Datasets

The datasets can be downloaded via this.

or via command line

pip install gdown 
gdown https://drive.google.com/uc?id=19wMFmpoo_0ORhBzB6n16B1nRRX508AnJ
unzip datasets.zip
rm datasets.zip

A documentation of dataset format and usage can be found in this wiki-page

classification:

Name	Task	# class	# LF	# train	# validation	# test	data source	LF source
Census	income clasification	2	83	10083	5561	16281	link	link
Youtube	spam clasification	2	10	1586	120	250	link	link
SMS	spam clasification	2	73	4571	500	500	link	link
IMDB	sentiment clasification	2	8	20000	2500	2500	link	link
Yelp	sentiment clasification	2	8	30400	3800	3800	link	link
AGNews	topic clasification	4	9	96000	12000	12000	link	link
TREC	question classification	6	68	4965	500	500	link	link
Spouse	relation classification	2	9	22254	2801	2701	link	link
SemEval	relation classification	9	164	1749	200	692	link	link
CDR	bio relation classification	2	33	8430	920	4673	link	link
Chemprot	chemical relation classification	10	26	12861	1607	1607	link	link
Commercial	video frame classification	2	4	64130	9479	7496	link	link
Tennis Rally	video frame classification	2	6	6959	746	1098	link	link
Basketball	video frame classification	2	4	17970	1064	1222	link	link

sequence tagging:

Name	# class	# LF	# train	# validation	# test	data source	LF source
CoNLL-03	4	16	14041	3250	3453	link	link
WikiGold	4	16	1355	169	170	link	link
OntoNotes 5.0	18	17	115812	5000	22897	link	link
BC5CDR	2	9	500	500	500	link	link
NCBI-Disease	1	5	592	99	99	link	link
Laptop-Review	1	3	2436	609	800	link	link
MIT-Restaurant	8	16	7159	500	1521	link	link
MIT-Movies	12	7	9241	500	2441	link	link

The detailed documentation is coming soon.

🔧 Available Models

classification:

Model	Model Type	Reference	Link to Wrench
Majority Voting	Label Model	--	link
Weighted Majority Voting	Label Model	--	link
Dawid-Skene	Label Model	link	link
Data Progamming	Label Model	link	link
MeTaL	Label Model	link	link
FlyingSquid	Label Model	link	link
Logistic Regression	End Model	--	link
MLP	End Model	--	link
BERT	End Model	link	link
COSINE	End Model	link	link
Denoise	Joint Model	link	link

sequence tagging:

Model	Model Type	Reference	Link to Wrench
Hidden Markov Model	Label Model	link	link
Conditional Hidden Markov Model	Label Model	link	link
LSTM-CNNs-CRF	End Model	link	link
BERT-CRF	End Model	link	link
LSTM-ConNet	Joint Model	link	link
BERT-ConNet	Joint Model	link	link

classification-to-sequence-tagging wrapper:

Wrench also provides a SeqLabelModelWrapper that adaptes label model for classification task to sequence tagging task.

🔧 Quick examples

🔧 Label model with parallel grid search for hyper-parameters

import logging
import numpy as np
import pprint

from wrench.dataset import load_dataset
from wrench.logging import LoggingHandler
from wrench.search import grid_search
from wrench import labelmodel 
from wrench.evaluation import AverageMeter

#### Just some code to print debug information to stdout
logging.basicConfig(format='%(asctime)s - %(message)s',
                    datefmt='%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S',
                    level=logging.INFO,
                    handlers=[LoggingHandler()])
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

#### Load dataset 
dataset_home = '../datasets'
data = 'youtube'
train_data, valid_data, test_data = load_dataset(dataset_home, data, extract_feature=False)


#### Specify the hyper-parameter search space for grid search
search_space = {
    'Snorkel': {
        'lr': np.logspace(-5, -1, num=5, base=10),
        'l2': np.logspace(-5, -1, num=5, base=10),
        'n_epochs': [5, 10, 50, 100, 200],
    }
}

#### Initialize label model
label_model_name = 'Snorkel'
label_model = getattr(labelmodel, label_model_name)

#### Search best hyper-parameters using validation set in parallel
n_trials = 100
n_repeats = 5
target = 'acc'
searched_paras = grid_search(label_model(), dataset_train=train_data, dataset_valid=valid_data,
                             metric=target, direction='auto', search_space=search_space[label_model_name],
                             n_repeats=n_repeats, n_trials=n_trials, parallel=True)

#### Evaluate the label model with searched hyper-parameters and average meter
meter = AverageMeter(names=[target])
for i in range(n_repeats):
    model = label_model(**searched_paras)
    history = model.fit(dataset_train=train_data, dataset_valid=valid_data)
    metric_value = model.test(test_data, target)
    meter.update(target=metric_value)

metrics = meter.get_results()
pprint.pprint(metrics)

For detailed guidance of grid_search, please check out this wiki page.

🔧 Run a standard supervised learning pipeline

import logging
import torch

from wrench.dataset import load_dataset
from wrench.logging import LoggingHandler
from wrench.endmodel import MLPModel

#### Just some code to print debug information to stdout
logging.basicConfig(format='%(asctime)s - %(message)s',
                    datefmt='%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S',
                    level=logging.INFO,
                    handlers=[LoggingHandler()])
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

#### Load dataset 
dataset_home = '../datasets'
data = 'youtube'

#### Extract data features using pre-trained BERT model and cache it
extract_fn = 'bert'
model_name = 'bert-base-cased'
train_data, valid_data, test_data = load_dataset(dataset_home, data, extract_feature=True, extract_fn=extract_fn,
                                                 cache_name=extract_fn, model_name=model_name)


#### Train a MLP classifier
device = torch.device('cuda:0')
n_steps = 100000
batch_size = 128
test_batch_size = 1000 
patience = 200
evaluation_step = 50
target='acc'

model = MLPModel(n_steps=n_steps, batch_size=batch_size, test_batch_size=test_batch_size)
history = model.fit(dataset_train=train_data, dataset_valid=valid_data, device=device, metric=target, 
                    patience=patience, evaluation_step=evaluation_step)

#### Evaluate the trained model
metric_value = model.test(test_data, target)

🔧 Build a two-stage weak supervision pipeline

import logging
import torch

from wrench.dataset import load_dataset
from wrench.logging import LoggingHandler
from wrench.endmodel import MLPModel
from wrench.labelmodel import MajorityVoting

#### Just some code to print debug information to stdout
logging.basicConfig(format='%(asctime)s - %(message)s',
                    datefmt='%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S',
                    level=logging.INFO,
                    handlers=[LoggingHandler()])
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

#### Load dataset 
dataset_home = '../datasets'
data = 'youtube'

#### Extract data features using pre-trained BERT model and cache it
extract_fn = 'bert'
model_name = 'bert-base-cased'
train_data, valid_data, test_data = load_dataset(dataset_home, data, extract_feature=True, extract_fn=extract_fn,
                                                 cache_name=extract_fn, model_name=model_name)

#### Generate soft training label via a label model
#### The weak labels provided by supervision sources are alreadly encoded in dataset object
label_model = MajorityVoting()
label_model.fit(train_data, valid_data)
soft_label = label_model.predict_proba(train_data)


#### Train a MLP classifier with soft label
device = torch.device('cuda:0')
n_steps = 100000
batch_size = 128
test_batch_size = 1000 
patience = 200
evaluation_step = 50
target='acc'

model = MLPModel(n_steps=n_steps, batch_size=batch_size, test_batch_size=test_batch_size)
history = model.fit(dataset_train=train_data, dataset_valid=valid_data, y_train=soft_label, 
                    device=device, metric=target, patience=patience, evaluation_step=evaluation_step)

#### Evaluate the trained model
metric_value = model.test(test_data, target)

#### We can also train a MLP classifier with hard label
from snorkel.utils import probs_to_preds
hard_label = probs_to_preds(soft_label)
model = MLPModel(n_steps=n_steps, batch_size=batch_size, test_batch_size=test_batch_size)
model.fit(dataset_train=train_data, dataset_valid=valid_data, y_train=hard_label, 
          device=device, metric=target, patience=patience, evaluation_step=evaluation_step)

🔧 Procedural labeling function generator

import logging
import torch

from wrench.dataset import load_dataset
from wrench.logging import LoggingHandler
from wrench.synthetic import ConditionalIndependentGenerator, NGramLFGenerator
from wrench.labelmodel import FlyingSquid

#### Just some code to print debug information to stdout
logging.basicConfig(format='%(asctime)s - %(message)s',
                    datefmt='%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S',
                    level=logging.INFO,
                    handlers=[LoggingHandler()])
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)


#### Generate synthetic dataset
generator = ConditionalIndependentGenerator(
    n_class=2,
    n_lfs=10,
    alpha=0.75, # mean accuracy
    beta=0.1, # mean propensity
    alpha_radius=0.2, # radius of accuracy
    beta_radius=0.1 # radius of propensity
)
train_data = generator.generate_split('train', 10000)
valid_data = generator.generate_split('valid', 1000)
test_data = generator.generate_split('test', 1000)

#### Evaluate label model on synthetic dataset
label_model = FlyingSquid()
label_model.fit(dataset_train=train_data, dataset_valid=valid_data)
target_value = label_model.test(test_data, metric_fn='auc')

#### Load dataset 
dataset_home = '../datasets'
data = 'youtube'

#### Load real-world dataset
train_data, valid_data, test_data = load_dataset(dataset_home, data, extract_feature=False)

#### Generate procedural labeling functions
generator = NGramLFGenerator(dataset=train_data, min_acc_gain=0.1, min_support=0.01, ngram_range=(1, 2))
applier = generator.generate(mode='correlated', n_lfs=10)
L_test = applier.apply(test_data)
L_train = applier.apply(train_data)


#### Evaluate label model on real-world dataset with semi-synthetic labeling functions
label_model = FlyingSquid()
label_model.fit(dataset_train=L_train, dataset_valid=valid_data)
target_value = label_model.test(L_test, metric_fn='auc')

🔧 Contact

Contact person: Jieyu Zhang, [email protected]

Don't hesitate to send us an e-mail if you have any question.

We're also open to any collaboration!

🔧 Contributing Dataset and Model

We sincerely welcome any contribution to the datasets or models!

Comments

ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'tokenizations'

Hi, I faced some problems when trying to install the library. I tried to use pip install ws-benchmark==1.1.2rc0 as suggested in the document, the installation was successful but when I run the code I faced the error ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'tokenizations'. Then I tried to clone the repository and create the environment using conda env create -f environment.yml, but the installation failed due to the following error FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/naiqing/miniconda3/envs/wrench/lib/python3.6/site-packages/huggingface_hub-0.0.16-py3.8.egg'. Do you have ideas on what might cause the problem and how can I fix it?

opened by Gnaiqing 12
Is there a limitation of using dataset for different algs?
Firstly, thank you for building this awesome benchmark. While I try the example with different datasets (e.g., I try astra with youtube dataset), I got some errors like this,

loss = cross_entropy_with_probs(predict_l, batch['labels'].to(device)) KeyError: 'labels'

Can this be fixed?
opened by mrbeann 8

Python Package Installation Fails

Installing ws-benchmark python package fails due to dependency conflict (see stack trace below).

Tested on system:

OS: ubuntu
Python: 3.8.13
Clean VE

Command to replicate:

pip install ws-benchmark

Stack Trace:

ERROR: Cannot install ws-benchmark and ws-benchmark==1.1.1 because these package versions have conflicting dependencies.

The conflict is caused by:
    ws-benchmark 1.1.1 depends on networkx==2.7
    snorkel 0.9.7 depends on networkx<2.4 and >=2.2

To fix this you could try to:
1. loosen the range of package versions you've specified
2. remove package versions to allow pip attempt to solve the dependency conflict

ERROR: ResolutionImpossible: for help visit https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/topics/dependency-resolution/#dealing-with-dependency-conflicts

opened by bradleyfowler123 4

Using Multiple GPUs

Hi,

Is it possible to use multiple GPUs for the experiments, or will it be in future releases? It would be a nice feature if it is not possible right now.

Best regards.

opened by tolgayan 4

Running scripts

Hi, I am trying to run some models on the IMDB dataset.

MLP:

import logging
import torch
import numpy as np
from wrench.dataset import load_dataset
from wrench.labelmodel import Snorkel
from wrench.logging import LoggingHandler
from wrench.search import grid_search
from wrench.endmodel import EndClassifierModel

#### Just some code to print debug information to stdout
logging.basicConfig(format='%(asctime)s - %(message)s',
                    datefmt='%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S',
                    level=logging.INFO,
                    handlers=[LoggingHandler()])

logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

device = torch.device('cuda')

if __name__ == '__main__':
    #### Load dataset
    dataset_path = '../datasets/'
    data = "imdb"
    bert_model_name = "bert-base-cased"
    train_data, valid_data, test_data = load_dataset(
        dataset_path,
        data,
        extract_feature=True,
        extract_fn='bert',  # extract bert embedding
        model_name=bert_model_name,
        cache_name='bert',
        dataset_type="TextDataset"
    )

    #### Run label model: Snorkel
    label_model = Snorkel(
        lr=0.005,
        l2=0,
        n_epochs=200,
        seed=123
    )
    label_model.fit(
        dataset_train=train_data,
        dataset_valid=valid_data
    )

    acc = label_model.test(test_data, 'acc')
    logger.info(f'label model test acc: {acc}')

    #### Filter out uncovered training data
    aggregated_hard_labels = label_model.predict(train_data)
    aggregated_soft_labels = label_model.predict_proba(train_data)

    #### Search Space
    search_space = {
        'optimizer_lr': np.logspace(-5, -1, num=5, base=10),
        'optimizer_weight_decay': np.logspace(-5, -1, num=5, base=10),
    }

    #### Initialize the model: MLP
    model = EndClassifierModel(
        batch_size=8,
        real_batch_size=8,
        test_batch_size=8,
        backbone='MLP',
        optimizer='Adam'
    )

    #### Search best hyper-parameters using validation set in parallel
    n_trials = 20
    n_repeats = 1
    searched_paras = grid_search(
        model,
        dataset_train=train_data,
        y_train=aggregated_soft_labels,
        dataset_valid=valid_data,
        metric='acc',
        direction='auto',
        search_space=search_space,
        n_repeats=n_repeats,
        n_trials=n_trials,
        parallel=True,
        device=device,
    )


    #### Run end model: MLP
    model = EndClassifierModel(
        batch_size=8,
        real_batch_size=8,
        test_batch_size=8,
        backbone='MLP',
        optimizer='Adam',
        **searched_paras
    )
    model.fit(
        dataset_train=train_data,
        y_train=aggregated_soft_labels,
        dataset_valid=valid_data,
        metric='acc',
        device=device
    )

    logger.info(model.predict(test_data).tolist())

    acc = model.test(test_data, 'acc')
    logger.info(f'end model (MLP) test acc: {acc}')

for which I am getting the following output:

100%|██████████| 20000/20000 [00:00<00:00, 902651.16it/s]
100%|██████████| 2500/2500 [00:00<00:00, 852639.45it/s]
100%|██████████| 2500/2500 [00:00<00:00, 829503.99it/s]
Some weights of the model checkpoint at bert-base-cased were not used when initializing BertModel: ['cls.predictions.decoder.weight', 'cls.seq_relationship.bias', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.bias', 'cls.seq_relationship.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.bias', 'cls.predictions.bias', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.weight']
- This IS expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model trained on another task or with another architecture (e.g. initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForPreTraining model).
- This IS NOT expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model that you expect to be exactly identical (initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForSequenceClassification model).
100%|██████████| 20000/20000 [1:42:45<00:00,  3.24it/s]  
Some weights of the model checkpoint at bert-base-cased were not used when initializing BertModel: ['cls.predictions.decoder.weight', 'cls.seq_relationship.bias', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.bias', 'cls.seq_relationship.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.bias', 'cls.predictions.bias', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.weight']
- This IS expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model trained on another task or with another architecture (e.g. initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForPreTraining model).
- This IS NOT expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model that you expect to be exactly identical (initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForSequenceClassification model).
100%|██████████| 2500/2500 [13:24<00:00,  3.11it/s]
Some weights of the model checkpoint at bert-base-cased were not used when initializing BertModel: ['cls.predictions.decoder.weight', 'cls.seq_relationship.bias', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.bias', 'cls.seq_relationship.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.bias', 'cls.predictions.bias', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.weight']
- This IS expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model trained on another task or with another architecture (e.g. initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForPreTraining model).
- This IS NOT expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model that you expect to be exactly identical (initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForSequenceClassification model).
100%|██████████| 2500/2500 [13:50<00:00,  3.01it/s]
[I 2021-10-23 22:24:36,807] A new study created in memory with name: no-name-9e4ad09c-ea4a-4ee8-80c2-7633429e4038
huggingface/tokenizers: The current process just got forked, after parallelism has already been used. Disabling parallelism to avoid deadlocks...
To disable this warning, you can either:
        - Avoid using `tokenizers` before the fork if possible
        - Explicitly set the environment variable TOKENIZERS_PARALLELISM=(true | false)
2021-10-23 20:14:19 - loading data from ../datasets/imdb/train.json
2021-10-23 20:14:19 - loading data from ../datasets/imdb/valid.json
2021-10-23 20:14:19 - loading data from ../datasets/imdb/test.json
2021-10-23 21:57:10 - saving features into ../datasets/imdb/train_bert.pkl
2021-10-23 22:10:40 - saving features into ../datasets/imdb/valid_bert.pkl
2021-10-23 22:24:36 - saving features into ../datasets/imdb/test_bert.pkl
2021-10-23 22:24:36 - label model test acc: 0.716
huggingface/tokenizers: The current process just got forked, after parallelism has already been used. Disabling parallelism to avoid deadlocks...
To disable this warning, you can either:
        - Avoid using `tokenizers` before the fork if possible
        - Explicitly set the environment variable TOKENIZERS_PARALLELISM=(true | false)
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:37<00:00, 37.48s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:25:14,563] Trial 0 finished with value: 0.5012 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.001, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.0001}. Best is trial 0 with value: 0.5012.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:23<00:00, 23.70s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:25:38,448] Trial 1 finished with value: 0.496 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 1e-05, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.1}. Best is trial 0 with value: 0.5012.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:14<00:00, 14.53s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:25:53,171] Trial 2 finished with value: 0.5004 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.1, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.001}. Best is trial 0 with value: 0.5012.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:43<00:00, 43.73s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:26:37,071] Trial 3 finished with value: 0.5088 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.001, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.001}. Best is trial 3 with value: 0.5088.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:18<00:00, 18.85s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:26:56,161] Trial 4 finished with value: 0.488 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.001, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.1}. Best is trial 3 with value: 0.5088.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:38<00:00, 38.81s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:27:35,214] Trial 5 finished with value: 0.4948 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.0001, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.1}. Best is trial 3 with value: 0.5088.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:38<00:00, 38.15s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:28:13,614] Trial 6 finished with value: 0.5024 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.01, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.01}. Best is trial 3 with value: 0.5088.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:15<00:00, 15.47s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:28:29,335] Trial 7 finished with value: 0.4996 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.1, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 1e-05}. Best is trial 3 with value: 0.5088.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:22<00:00, 22.49s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:28:52,093] Trial 8 finished with value: 0.5008 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.0001, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 1e-05}. Best is trial 3 with value: 0.5088.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:40<00:00, 40.25s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:29:32,594] Trial 9 finished with value: 0.5008 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.0001, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.0001}. Best is trial 3 with value: 0.5088.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:39<00:00, 39.06s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:30:11,902] Trial 10 finished with value: 0.5116 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 1e-05, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 1e-05}. Best is trial 10 with value: 0.5116.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:43<00:00, 43.46s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:30:55,531] Trial 11 finished with value: 0.4912 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.001, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 1e-05}. Best is trial 10 with value: 0.5116.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:23<00:00, 23.41s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:31:19,095] Trial 12 finished with value: 0.4956 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.001, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.01}. Best is trial 10 with value: 0.5116.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:22<00:00, 22.12s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:31:41,374] Trial 13 finished with value: 0.492 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 1e-05, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.01}. Best is trial 10 with value: 0.5116.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:15<00:00, 15.78s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:31:57,283] Trial 14 finished with value: 0.5044 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.1, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.0001}. Best is trial 10 with value: 0.5116.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:37<00:00, 37.28s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:32:34,728] Trial 15 finished with value: 0.488 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 1e-05, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.001}. Best is trial 10 with value: 0.5116.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:16<00:00, 16.04s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:32:50,934] Trial 16 finished with value: 0.4924 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.0001, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.001}. Best is trial 10 with value: 0.5116.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:19<00:00, 19.65s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:33:10,753] Trial 17 finished with value: 0.5156 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.1, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.1}. Best is trial 17 with value: 0.5156.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:15<00:00, 15.41s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:33:26,345] Trial 18 finished with value: 0.5068 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.01, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.001}. Best is trial 17 with value: 0.5156.
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:16<00:00, 16.75s/it]
[I 2021-10-23 22:33:43,222] Trial 19 finished with value: 0.498 and parameters: {'optimizer_lr': 0.0001, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.01}. Best is trial 17 with value: 0.5156.
[TRAIN]:  15%|█████▌                               | 1499/10000 [00:21<02:04, 68.19steps/s, loss=4.02, val_acc=0.5, best_val_acc=0.508, best_step=500]
2021-10-23 22:33:43 - [END: BEST VAL / PARAMS] Best value: 0.5156, Best paras: {'optimizer_lr': 0.1, 'optimizer_weight_decay': 0.1}
2021-10-23 22:33:43 - 
==========[hyper parameters]==========
{
    "batch_size": 8,
    "real_batch_size": 8,
    "test_batch_size": 8,
    "n_steps": 10000,
    "grad_norm": -1,
    "use_lr_scheduler": false,
    "binary_mode": false
}
==========[optimizer config]==========
{
    "name": "Adam",
    "paras": {
        "lr": 0.1,
        "weight_decay": 0.1
    }
}
==========[backbone config]==========
{
    "name": "MLP",
    "paras": {
        "hidden_size": 100,
        "dropout": 0.0
    }
}

2021-10-23 22:34:09 - [INFO] early stop @ step 1500!
2021-10-23 22:34:09 - [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
2021-10-23 22:34:09 - end model (MLP) test acc: 0.5004

COSINE:

import logging
import torch
from wrench.dataset import load_dataset
from wrench.logging import LoggingHandler
from wrench.labelmodel import Snorkel
from wrench.endmodel import Cosine

#### Just some code to print debug information to stdout
logging.basicConfig(format='%(asctime)s - %(message)s',
                    datefmt='%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S',
                    level=logging.INFO,
                    handlers=[LoggingHandler()])

logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

device = torch.device('cuda')

if __name__ == '__main__':
    #### Load dataset
    dataset_path = '../datasets/'
    data = "imdb"
    bert_model_name = "bert-base-cased"
    train_data, valid_data, test_data = load_dataset(
        dataset_path,
        data,
        extract_feature=True,
        extract_fn='bert',  # extract bert embedding
        model_name=bert_model_name,
        cache_name='bert',
        dataset_type="TextDataset"
    )

    #### Run label model: Snorkel
    label_model = Snorkel(
        lr=0.005,
        l2=0,
        n_epochs=200,
        seed=123
    )
    label_model.fit(
        dataset_train=train_data,
        dataset_valid=valid_data
    )

    acc = label_model.test(test_data, 'acc')
    logger.info(f'label model test acc: {acc}')

    #### Filter out uncovered training data
    aggregated_hard_labels = label_model.predict(train_data)
    aggregated_soft_labels = label_model.predict_proba(train_data)


    # COSINE
    model = Cosine(
        teacher_update=100,
        margin=1.0,
        thresh=0.6,
        lr=1e-5,
        mu=1.0,
        lamda=0.05,
        backbone='BERT',
        backbone_model_name=bert_model_name,
        batch_size=8,
        real_batch_size=8,
        test_batch_size=8,
    )

    model.fit(dataset_train=train_data,
              dataset_valid=valid_data,
              y_train=aggregated_hard_labels,
              evaluation_step=10,
              metric='acc',
              patience=50,
              device=device)

    acc = model.test(test_data, 'acc')

    logger.info(model.predict(test_data))

    logger.info(f'end model (COSINE) test acc: {acc}')

for which I am getting the following output:

100%|██████████| 20000/20000 [00:00<00:00, 899119.81it/s]
100%|██████████| 2500/2500 [00:00<00:00, 423667.07it/s]
100%|██████████| 2500/2500 [00:00<00:00, 802645.44it/s]
Some weights of the model checkpoint at bert-base-cased were not used when initializing BertModel: ['cls.predictions.bias', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.bias', 'cls.seq_relationship.bias', 'cls.predictions.decoder.weight', 'cls.seq_relationship.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.bias']
- This IS expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model trained on another task or with another architecture (e.g. initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForPreTraining model).
- This IS NOT expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model that you expect to be exactly identical (initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForSequenceClassification model).
100%|██████████| 20000/20000 [1:47:44<00:00,  3.09it/s]  
Some weights of the model checkpoint at bert-base-cased were not used when initializing BertModel: ['cls.predictions.bias', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.bias', 'cls.seq_relationship.bias', 'cls.predictions.decoder.weight', 'cls.seq_relationship.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.bias']
- This IS expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model trained on another task or with another architecture (e.g. initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForPreTraining model).
- This IS NOT expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model that you expect to be exactly identical (initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForSequenceClassification model).
100%|██████████| 2500/2500 [14:22<00:00,  2.90it/s]
Some weights of the model checkpoint at bert-base-cased were not used when initializing BertModel: ['cls.predictions.bias', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.bias', 'cls.seq_relationship.bias', 'cls.predictions.decoder.weight', 'cls.seq_relationship.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.bias']
- This IS expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model trained on another task or with another architecture (e.g. initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForPreTraining model).
- This IS NOT expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model that you expect to be exactly identical (initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForSequenceClassification model).
100%|██████████| 2500/2500 [13:33<00:00,  3.07it/s] 
Some weights of the model checkpoint at bert-base-cased were not used when initializing BertModel: ['cls.predictions.bias', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.dense.bias', 'cls.seq_relationship.bias', 'cls.predictions.decoder.weight', 'cls.seq_relationship.weight', 'cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.bias']
- This IS expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model trained on another task or with another architecture (e.g. initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForPreTraining model).
- This IS NOT expected if you are initializing BertModel from the checkpoint of a model that you expect to be exactly identical (initializing a BertForSequenceClassification model from a BertForSequenceClassification model).
[TRAIN] COSINE pretrain stage:   5%|▊               | 509/10000 [21:19<6:37:40,  2.51s/steps, loss=0.605, val_acc=0.5, best_val_acc=0.5, best_step=10]
[TRAIN] COSINE distillation stage:   0%|                                                                                 | 0/10000 [03:05<?, ?steps/s]
2021-10-23 20:14:13 - loading data from ../datasets/imdb/train.json
2021-10-23 20:14:13 - loading data from ../datasets/imdb/valid.json
2021-10-23 20:14:14 - loading data from ../datasets/imdb/test.json
2021-10-23 22:02:05 - saving features into ../datasets/imdb/train_bert.pkl
2021-10-23 22:16:34 - saving features into ../datasets/imdb/valid_bert.pkl
2021-10-23 22:30:14 - saving features into ../datasets/imdb/test_bert.pkl
2021-10-23 22:30:14 - label model test acc: 0.716
2021-10-23 22:30:17 - 
==========[hyper parameters]==========
{
    "teacher_update": 100,
    "margin": 1.0,
    "mu": 1.0,
    "thresh": 0.6,
    "lamda": 0.05,
    "batch_size": 8,
    "real_batch_size": 8,
    "test_batch_size": 8,
    "n_steps": 10000,
    "grad_norm": -1,
    "use_lr_scheduler": false,
    "binary_mode": false
}
==========[optimizer config]==========
{
    "name": "Adam",
    "paras": {
        "lr": 0.001,
        "weight_decay": 0.0
    }
}
==========[backbone config]==========
{
    "name": "BERT",
    "paras": {
        "model_name": "bert-base-cased",
        "max_tokens": 512,
        "fine_tune_layers": -1
    }
}
==========[label model_config config]==========
{
    "name": "MajorityVoting",
    "paras": {}
}

2021-10-23 22:51:52 - [INFO] early stop @ step 510!
2021-10-23 22:55:20 - early stop because all the data are filtered!
2021-10-23 22:56:06 - [1 1 1 ... 1 1 1]
2021-10-23 22:56:06 - end model (COSINE) test acc: 0.5

As can be seen for both models, label model test acc: 0.716 but end model (MLP) test acc: 0.5004 and end model (COSINE) test acc: 0.5.

Am I doing something completely wrong? Could you please tell me if I am running the code correctly or is there some issue with hyperparameters?

I would greatly appreciate if you could give me some advice. I would be very glad if you could include an example running script of the COSINE model as well.

Thanks for the benchmark, I really appreciate it!

opened by viheheb757 4

Reproducing Table 11 for classification

Thanks for this package @JieyuZ2 -- do you happen to have an orchestration script for reproducing Table 11 (and therefore Table 3) in the Wrench paper?

opened by pmangg 3

No module named 'wrench.classification.self_training'

Hi, I am trying to run run_denoise.py but I am getting the following error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "run_denoise.py", line 5, in <module>
    from wrench.classification import Denoise
  File "/gpfs/space/home/wrench/wrench/classification/__init__.py", line 4, in <module>
    from .self_training import LDSelfTrain, DDSelfTrain
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'wrench.classification.self_training'

Could you please add LDSelfTrain and DDSelfTrain classes?

opened by andreaspung 3

Questions on the use of ground-truth labels for validation

Thanks for putting up the benchmark! This is really great work! It seems that both the label model and the end model use the ground-truth labels for validation. For example, the base label model uses the ground-truth labels of the validation set to calculate the class balance weights: https://github.com/JieyuZ2/wrench/blob/544119e781d010797cf153307aa1090361c99522/wrench/basemodel.py#L286 I have a few questions regarding this: (1) A valid baseline for the label models would be a classifier trained on the validation set with the weak labels of LFs as features and the ground-truth labels as the target. Given that the validation set for most datasets is actually not small, I feel the trained model might be a pretty strong baseline compared to other unsupervised label models. (2) Similar to how we combine the weak labels on the training set to get aggregated labels, we could also get aggregated labels for the validation set. Then, the aggregated labels instead of the ground-truth labels of the validation set could be used for validation purposes for the end model. Wouldn't this be a more realistic setting? Especially considering that the proposal of weak supervision is to replace human labeling with programmatical labeling.

I appreciate any explanations. Thanks!

opened by wurenzhi 2
Clarifying dataset download links
Great work on the benchmark!

Under the "Available Datasets" section on the main README, you provide 2 links for downloading the WRENCH datasets:

Google drive folder

Zip file download datasets.zip

One point of confusion is that expanded datasets found on the Google drive link are different than the direct download zip file. For example, classification/youtube/train.json on Google drive has 1686 instances while the zip file contains 1586 for the same file, matching the statistics reported on the README. Can you make the correct file download unambiguous in the documentation?
opened by jason-fries 2
Fix retained probabilities

This pull request removes a bug which lead to the wrong probabilities being stored along with the predictions of each labeling function.

Previously, all probabilities (2d tensor of size batch by classes) were saved alongside the class predictions. However, what was supposed to be saved is the probability associated with each prediction of the model.

opened by benbo 2
New Release

Hi! Love the repo, super useful so far and really easy interface to use. Thanks for putting it together!

I was wondering if there were plans to cut another release any time soon? We use the v1.0 tag for making sure the version is consistent across multiple builds. Noticed a few bug fixes and QOL improvements since the last release, and those would be nice to have marked at a new tag.

opened by rsmith49 2

Numba 0.43 doesn't work with newer Python versions

The numba package 0.43, specified here, doesn't work with Python 3.9. Upgrading the package to the latest version (0.54) resolves the issue. Traceback:

/home/murphy/anaconda3/envs/taskbase/lib/python3.9/site-packages/llvmlite/llvmpy/__init__.py:3: UserWarning: The module `llvmlite.llvmpy` is deprecated and will be removed in the future.
  warnings.warn(
/home/murphy/anaconda3/envs/taskbase/lib/python3.9/site-packages/llvmlite/llvmpy/core.py:8: UserWarning: The module `llvmlite.llvmpy.core` is deprecated and will be removed in the future. Equivalent functionality is provided by `llvmlite.ir`.
  warnings.warn(
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1007, in _find_and_load
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 986, in _find_and_load_unlocked
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 680, in _load_unlocked
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 850, in exec_module
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 228, in _call_with_frames_removed
  File "/home/murphy/anaconda3/envs/taskbase/lib/python3.9/site-packages/wrench/labelmodel/__init__.py", line 1, in <module>
    from .dawid_skene import DawidSkene
  File "/home/murphy/anaconda3/envs/taskbase/lib/python3.9/site-packages/wrench/labelmodel/dawid_skene.py", line 6, in <module>
    from numba import njit, prange
  File "/home/murphy/anaconda3/envs/taskbase/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numba/__init__.py", line 25, in <module>
    from .decorators import autojit, cfunc, generated_jit, jit, njit, stencil
  File "/home/murphy/anaconda3/envs/taskbase/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numba/decorators.py", line 12, in <module>
    from .targets import registry
  File "/home/murphy/anaconda3/envs/taskbase/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numba/targets/registry.py", line 5, in <module>
    from . import cpu
  File "/home/murphy/anaconda3/envs/taskbase/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numba/targets/cpu.py", line 9, in <module>
    from numba import _dynfunc, config
ImportError: /home/murphy/anaconda3/envs/taskbase/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numba/_dynfunc.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: undefined symbol: _PyObject_GC_UNTRACK

opened by susuzheng 0

COSINE for token classification?

Hi,

I would like to know whether the code for cosine weak-supervision technique is already capable of performing token classification? Or else what changes should I need to do to build a weakly-supervised training pipeline using some weakly-labeled and unlabeled datasets?

opened by KrishnanJothi 0
Balance in Dawid Skene is obsolete.

https://github.com/JieyuZ2/wrench/blob/6d8397956533fc6c2fe50e93fcfe0a2303bdd05f/wrench/labelmodel/dawid_skene.py#L55

I realized this balance variable is used nowhere in this file. If it is intended, I think it should be removed from input parameters.

opened by ch-shin 1
Balance sum to 1

https://github.com/JieyuZ2/wrench/blob/ab717ac26a76649c8fdb946a28dffe7e682c80ba/wrench/basemodel.py#L303

Hi, I find a minor issue that the class prior computed by this function does not sum to 1. Hope you can revise it.

opened by Gnaiqing 0
about COSINE endmodel

Hi @JieyuZ2 and @yinxiangshi , I am trying to run the COSINE endmodel but I have some troubles in reproducing the results in COSINE paper. Although I tried to use the suggested hyperparameters I still get marginal benefit from wrench, and I'm not sure where is wrong. Can you share the scripts you used when evaluating COSINE? Thanks.

opened by Gnaiqing 0
Recommended parameters to use for each algorithms and datasets.

I've tried several combinations of different algorithms and datasets, but I found it's hard to get results similar to the paper. I suspect this is due to inappropriate parameter settings, so, I think it will be great if this repo can provide some recommended parameters. (Especially for the newly added algorithms, it's hard to judge if it get the right results)

opened by mrbeann 0

Releases(v1.1)

v1.1(Nov 9, 2021)
What's new:

A branch of new methods: WeaSEL, ImplyLoss, ASTRA, MeanTeacher, Meta-Weight-Net, Learning-to-Reweight

A new EndClassifierModel model which unifies all the classification backbones

Two new datasets on image classification

Support torch native amp for inference in the validation step

Support training on multiple GPUS via torch's DistributedDataParallel and the new parallel_fit function

fixed some bugs

Source code(tar.gz)
Source code(zip)
v1.0(Sep 7, 2021)

The first release of wrench!
Source code(tar.gz)
Source code(zip)

WRENCH: Weak supeRvision bENCHmark

Related tags

Overview

🔧 What is it?

🔧 What is weak supervision?

🔧 Installation

🔧 Available Datasets

classification:

sequence tagging:

🔧 Available Models

classification:

sequence tagging:

classification-to-sequence-tagging wrapper:

🔧 Quick examples

🔧 Label model with parallel grid search for hyper-parameters

🔧 Run a standard supervised learning pipeline

🔧 Build a two-stage weak supervision pipeline

🔧 Procedural labeling function generator

🔧 Contact

🔧 Contributing Dataset and Model

Comments

Releases(v1.1)

v1.1(Nov 9, 2021)

v1.0(Sep 7, 2021)

Owner

Jieyu Zhang

This code is for our paper "VTGAN: Semi-supervised Retinal Image Synthesis and Disease Prediction using Vision Transformers"

Research using Cirq!

Official PyTorch implementation of "The Center of Attention: Center-Keypoint Grouping via Attention for Multi-Person Pose Estimation" (ICCV 21).

A Decentralized Omnidirectional Visual-Inertial-UWB State Estimation System for Aerial Swar.

Cross-platform-profile-pic-changer - Script to change profile pictures across multiple platforms

A simple implementation of Kalman filter in Multi Object Tracking

Repo for Photon-Starved Scene Inference using Single Photon Cameras, ICCV 2021

Official implementation for "QS-Attn: Query-Selected Attention for Contrastive Learning in I2I Translation" (CVPR 2022)

Seasonal Contrast: Unsupervised Pre-Training from Uncurated Remote Sensing Data

MediaPipe Kullanarak İleri Seviye Bilgisayarla Görü

Contrastive Learning of Image Representations with Cross-Video Cycle-Consistency

OpenDILab Multi-Agent Environment

Everything you want about DP-Based Federated Learning, including Papers and Code. (Mechanism: Laplace or Gaussian, Dataset: femnist, shakespeare, mnist, cifar-10 and fashion-mnist. )

Language Models for the legal domain in Spanish done @ BSC-TEMU within the "Plan de las Tecnologías del Lenguaje" (Plan-TL).

🔥🔥High-Performance Face Recognition Library on PaddlePaddle & PyTorch🔥🔥

TrackFormer: Multi-Object Tracking with Transformers

It is the assignment for COMP 576 in Rice University

Numerical-computing-is-fun - Learning numerical computing with notebooks for all ages.

GANsformer: Generative Adversarial Transformers Drew A

Codebase for Amodal Segmentation through Out-of-Task andOut-of-Distribution Generalization with a Bayesian Model